Which DESC model sequence correctly addresses a teammate missing deadlines?

• A. Describe the impact, Express concern, Specify the change, Consequences of inaction.
• B. Describe solutions, Escalate, Confront, Separate.
• C. Discuss, Explain, Silence, Confirm.
• D. Deny, Emphasize, Suppress, Criticize.

Answer: (A)

The DESC approach for giving feedback about a teammate missing deadlines starts with describing the impact of the behavior on the project and team, then expressing concern about the result, then specifying the change you want, and finally outlining the consequences if nothing changes. This order keeps feedback concrete, personal, and action-oriented, while making clear what needs to happen next and why it matters.

In this situation, the best sequence is to describe the impact, express concern, specify the change, and lay out the consequences of inaction. Describing the exact effects on timelines and work质量 makes the issue tangible. Expressing concern signals that you care about the project and the teammate, which helps keep the conversation collaborative rather than combative. Specifying the change provides a clear, actionable request—what the teammate should do differently and by when. Reminding them of the consequences if nothing changes closes the loop, helping both of you stay accountable and focused on a timely resolution.

The other sequences don’t fit as well because they diverge from constructive, actionable feedback. One option moves toward escalation or separation, which can heighten defensiveness without clarifying a concrete remedy. Another option uses silence, which prevents a resolution and leaves the issue unresolved. A final option centers on denial and criticism, which are counterproductive and push the discussion away from helpful change.